Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RE-INSTATE SEAN evans

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 00:19:38 09/05/98

Go up one level in this thread



On September 04, 1998 at 15:27:13, Larry S. Tamarkin wrote:

>I also don't believe in the permenant banning of any individual - Its too
>tolatarian! It is in the nature of free speech/expression, that some will make
>outragous and incorrect claims and assumtions about others.  Anyone with common
>sence can interpert the real truth on many diverse matters.  Also people who
>have been attacked, usually have no problem(s) defending themselves, or having
>other's come to their defence.

I request that you look up "totalitarian" in the dictionary and let me know if
that is really the word you mean to use, Larry.

The reason CCC was founded was to get away from people who want to make
outrageous and incorrect claims and assertions about others.

Sean Evans caused trouble here from his very first post.  Eventually, he was
warned to stop doing this kind of thing, and by ignoring the warning made it
clear that he was not going to stop.  So he is gone from here.

If you still want to read his stuff, you can check rec.games.chess.computer,
where he is still doing the same old stuff.

I'm sure he'll copy either your post or this post and make some comments about
it over there.

>Perhaps one logical thing that could be done is to establish a time limit for
>the banning of any individual, always with an expiration time.

People can take responsibility for their actions.  If someone wants to cause
trouble here, they get kicked out.  I would be in favor of letting him back in
if I thought that he was unlikely to cause trouble here again.

Go over to r.g.c.c. and read Sean's stuff, Larry, and you tell me if this group
could use another dose of Sean Evans.

>Suggestion, 1 month first offense, 3 months 2nd offense, 1 year 3rd offense.
>True, the moderators would have to do a lot more work, keeping taps on what &
>who, and also notifying the offending party(s) why they were being temporarily
>banned, quoting offending post where necessary.  But I think what we gain here
>is a forum where contridictory views can be tollorated and also tempored to some
>degree.

I would like to encourage minority viewpoints and discourage personal attacks
and other forms of spam.

bruce



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.