Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:10:16 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2002 at 08:08:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 17, 2002 at 08:04:44, Vladimir Medvedev wrote: > >> >>>risk of 1/500000 in wrong repetition detection is not something that I agree to >>>accept. >> >>You can check for ( SearchRepetitions[...]==3 ) instead of "==2". >>Then you will get a wrong score (= DRAW) only if you have TRIPLE collision. >> >>Probability is 1/(500000 * 500000). > >The main problem is not wrong repetition detection in declaration but wrong >repetition detection in the search and in the search second repetition is >evaluated as a draw. > >Uri Correction first repetition. I mean second time that the same position appears. It is possible that it is better not to do it always but even programs that do not do it always evaluate repetition of position that did not appear in the game as a draw. I decided to evaluate every repetition as a draw because it is more simple. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.