Author: emerson tan
Date: 05:13:38 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 20:27:57, martin fierz wrote: >On October 16, 2002 at 17:57:10, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 16, 2002 at 17:53:25, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On October 16, 2002 at 16:43:53, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>I find it tasteless that Hsu claims that Deep Blue was in a 'different >>>>class' from Fritz and that it was not match for them, when he has no >>>>ability to back it up and the only public things we have about the two >>>>show differently. >>> >>>How do they show differently? >> >>'very old' Fritz beat 'very old' Deep Blue > >...and in a shveshnikov book line at that which was in the fritz book and not in >the DB book AFAIK. using one game alone as a proof is not a good idea. and if >that game was decided by the better opening book, then it gets downright >ridiculous. > >aloha > martin > > Kasparov wasalso beaten by deep Blues opening book in game six and kasparov loss by a point. Thats one game up as proof also. Deep Blue team started claiming victory. downright ridiculous also?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.