Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 15:14:56 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2002 at 13:09:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 17, 2002 at 06:46:50, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >You don't put on your 20GB harddrive box that it is >a 14(6) GB harddrive. > >Instead you sell it as 20GB. If you have 2 partitions on it, you can split it that way. Or do you think you should write that one partition is 20GB and the other is 6? >You are a complete idiot if you believe that 12(6) is 18 ply. I don't think I said anywhere that I believe 12(6) _is_ 18 ply. But I'm pretty sure it's more than 12. >There is so many statements now which if you litterary interpret them >means that 12(6) = 12 ply. > >The clearest statement is the advances of artificial intelligence. > >It seems to me that the only person who tries to present things better >than they are is Hsu. Hsu is the one who said 12 ply - how is that trying to present things better than they are? More like worse. >The documents which clearly state non-ambigious 12 ply are written >by 3 persons and proofreaded. The paper that states '12.2 ply' says that is the iteration depth, which is software.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.