Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT)

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 01:43:04 10/18/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 18, 2002 at 04:37:11, Peter Fendrich wrote:

>Of course!
>I'm planning to restructure my program Terra.

And you really planned to use the words 'public', 'protected' or 'private' based
on the 0.0000x % speed increase that may give you? Sheesh, I could have sworn
they're there for a different reason. :p

Sargon

• Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT) Peter Fendrich 05:36:08 10/18/02
  • Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT) Daniel Clausen 06:13:27 10/18/02
    • Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT) Dave Gomboc 12:14:37 10/19/02
• Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT) Uri Blass 03:27:22 10/18/02
  • Re: Q: Performance for public vs protected data in C++ (OT) Daniel Clausen 04:55:48 10/18/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.