Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 06:03:31 10/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2002 at 01:46:48, Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote: >On October 18, 2002 at 00:54:56, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 18, 2002 at 00:50:22, Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote: >> >>>I hope this is in connection to some chess software :-) >>> >>>Anyway, I don;t see any reason for that .. Compiler checks the access rights at >>>the time of compilation to see any illegal accesses. Once the code is compiled >>>there is no difference between private/public/protected >> >>I think the issue is whether the compiler can do more optimizations to >>private/protected stuff than to public stuff, or vice versa. > >thats what I meant. The compiler could do anything to any (public/protected) of >these, as long as it checks the access righst correctly at compile time.. And I >do'nt think access rights has anything to do with optimization.. > >tomar That's absolulely correct. The access qualifier have nothing to to with performance or optimization. Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.