Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 08:29:52 10/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2002 at 11:06:01, Mig Greengard wrote:
>Sorry to interrupt, but you seem to have left out a third option: Fritz had no
>idea how to continue and was repeating the position in its evaluation.
>Coincidentally, this is also the truth. Mathias is a very experienced operator
>and Fritz was not going to make in progress in that position if Kramnik
>continued to move his bishop back and forth. Fritz was moving its rooks around
>in the main lines.
>
>You may now rejoin your regularly scheduled conspiracy theory.
>
>Mig
-------------------
Hello Mig,
Lets get something clear here, i'am totally against this conspiracy thing!! As a
matter of fact in a few of my recent posts i told the person who expressed his
feelings in behalf of this conspiracy crap how i was totally against his
opinion!
My statement that i posted was the opinion of an International Master on
Chess.FM and you would have clearly seen that if you would have read it
correctly!
Again, i don't believe in any of this conspiracy nonesense!!!
Regards,
Terry
>
>
>On October 18, 2002 at 10:54:28, Terry Ripple wrote:
>
>>This statement was made on Chess.FM from a IM. He feels that Fritz had the
>>better of it in game #7, and should have continued to try for a win if it really
>>wanted a better chance to win the match, but the operator agreed to a draw.
>>Perhaps the operator needs some chess lessons or simply he was giving respect to
>>Kramnik!
>>
>>Regards,
>> Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.