Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate in 12 challenge for CHEST

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:09:07 10/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2002 at 17:00:21, F. Huber wrote:

>On October 18, 2002 at 15:33:11, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 18, 2002 at 14:42:55, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 17, 2002 at 01:09:45, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>And other programs as well.
>>>>
>>>>[D]rnbQKbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBqkBNR w - -
>>>>
>>>>Alybadix 2002 solves this in unbelievable 21,3 sec (Athlon 1466 Mhz). Look at
>>>>http://www.saunalahti.fi/~iblom/alybadix/ex2002.htm
>>>>
>>>>Jouni
>>>>
>>>>PS. Solution of course Nc3!
>>>
>>>That is correct.  Chest on Athlon 1500+ with 128 MB hash needs 2 hours:
>>>#  5      0.03s [  3.00]        5kN [  4.90]  1.36        337-         0
>>>#  6      0.09s [  3.00]       19kN [  3.57]  1.68       1164-         0
>>>#  7      0.37s [  4.11]       73kN [  3.89]  1.93       6250-         0
>>>#  8      1.92s [  5.19]      386kN [  5.29]  2.32      32241-         0
>>>#  9     17.29s [  9.01]     3472kN [  8.98]  2.32     312342-         0
>>># 10    110.95s [  6.42]    22525kN [  6.49]  2.53    1893435-     14248
>>># 11   1229.78s [ 11.08]   229968kN [ 10.21]  3.04   20799132-  17599899
>>># 12   7333.75s [  5.96]  1405765kN [  6.11]  3.05  117945772- 114746539
>>>
>>>PV: Nc3 Nf6+ Kxf7 Kxf1 Nf3+ Kxg2 Rxd1 Nc6 Rg1+ Kxf2 Nd1+ Kxe2 Nd4+ Nxd4 Qxc7 d6
>>>Qc4+ Kf3 Qd3+ Kf4 Qe3+ Kf5 Rg5#
>>>
>>>I'm not sure whether the comparison with Alybadix is completely fair.
>>>On that web page I read (in red) /Q3+ which seems to indicate a search
>>>restriction.  Hence I suspect a shorter mate is not absolutely ruled out
>>>by Alybadix.
>>
>>I understood from the site that it means that white has to play only checks or a
>>threat of mate in at most 3 moves.
>>
>>Uri
>
>And that´s exactly the point! With such restrictions you are able to get
>almost _every_ time (you want) on a special problem - but that doesn´t
>say _anything_ about the average solving times _without_ giving the program
>such additional informations.
>And I really would be interested, _who_ would know exactly _this_ restriction
>_before_ solving this chess problem? (If knowing the solution before, why
>using a mate solver at all ;-))

Knowing is impossible but it is possible to guess.
I think that having an option to restrict the search is productive.

Of course comparing times of it with times of chest is meaningless.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.