Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:14:14 10/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2002 at 15:07:52, martin fierz wrote: >while i generally agree with your last statement, the OS can never know quite >as well as the programmer what it should or should not be caching. so for best >performance it's generally a good idea to do the caching yourself if you know >it's necessary. True. It's not strictly necessary, it just improves performance if the OS is able to do some caching itself. The difference between Linux and Windows is striking here. >also, i wonder a bit what your bookbuilder does, why do you need disk >caching at all? shouldnt you just be reading each game in the database just >once? The book itself needs to be updated after each read game. There is already a simple caching layer in place, but it seems that on Windows it is not sufficient. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.