Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:34:24 10/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2002 at 13:28:13, martin fierz wrote: >On October 19, 2002 at 11:56:33, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On October 19, 2002 at 11:23:34, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>The match has put to rest some questions, or maybe not! >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>1. Do PC programs play at a GM Level? – Clearly Yes. >> >>This hasn't been an unanswered question for some time now. >> >>>2. Can PC programs win against a well prepared and motivated Grand Master? – >>>Yes. >> >>What evidence do you have that Kramnik was motivated? >> >>>4. Was Deep Blue 1997 was much stronger then Deep Fritz and other PC programs? - >>>No. >> >>Don't even start this again. The only thing that is clear about this is that >>it's not clear. >> >>>5. Can a PC program compete with the worlds best chess players even when it is >>>for sale to the public and everyone has a chance to play against the program? – >>>Yes. >> >>Same as #1 >> >>>8. Will it take another 10 years before anyone can have a computer that plays as >>>well as Deep Blue? No. >> >>Stop making definitive statements about Deep Blue vs. PC chess programs please. >>You, like everyone else, cannot address this subject definitively. >> >>Russell > >re points 1 & 5: mark could/should have made the statement stronger. it's true >that the question "can comps play at GM level" has been answered before. but GM >level and kramnik-level are two very different pairs of shoes! the last GM-fritz >match was huebner vs fritz, tied at 3-3, and although huebner is a strong player >of course he is no kramnik... > >aloha > martin Yes but Fritz got better relative to that match in software and hardware. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.