Author: John Smith
Date: 23:45:03 10/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 02:02:50, George Sobala wrote: >On October 20, 2002 at 01:43:26, John Smith wrote: > >>On October 19, 2002 at 23:59:52, John Rice wrote: >> >>>Thanks for the replies Uri and Wayne. My time controls generally range from 8/8 >>>up to 12/12. I did know about the fisher time control problem, and have tried >>>hard to utilize Tigers time controls (without increments) in the most effecient >>>manner. It gets difficult trying to guess what time limit to set when playing >>>12/12 games, but I get it close most of the time. Using the exact same set-up >>>with Chess Tiger 14, I get much better results at Yahoo than I do with Chess >>>Tiger 15. Is it possible CT15 has taken a step back in strength as opposed to >>>CT14 at these time controls? >>> >>>On October 19, 2002 at 17:40:46, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 19, 2002 at 17:32:48, John Rice wrote: >>>> >>>>>I haven't run any comp-comp tournaments with Chess Tiger 15, but I have had time >>>>>to play many online games at Yahoo's advance chess lounge against my usual >>>>>fellow program players. So far, I have to agree with John Smith and a few of the >>>>>other posters who are not having the success they expected with Chess Tiger 15. >>>> >>>> >>>>What time control do you play? >>>>I read that tiger15 does not support the fisher time control correctly so you >>>>should play x minutes per game or x minutes per y moves. >>>> >>>>Uri >> >> >> >>For the disappointing results in Yahoo(Hmmm, I wonder what your id is)is because >>of the blitz timers a certain number of individuals employ there (CT15 is not >>very good at blitz). >> >>I usually play anywhere from 15/15 to 25/25 and set ct15 timer to 60minutes >>fixed timer; 192mb hash;'secret' tweak settings[patent pending]. Under these >>parameters, ct15 is indeed one tough kitty to beat. >> >>My main complaint is with ct15's playing style. As has been pointed out by one >>of the beta testers,(Thorsten, I believe), CT15's style is very 'quiet'. >>Reminds me of tiger 12. >> >>I realize that some players palpitate and drool over Petrosian style chess, but >>that is not my cup of tea; I prefer the more aggressive style of GT2. >> >>In sum, ct15 is not weak in long time control. What it is, though, is a program >>with a somewhat passive style of play. > >So use it in Gambit Aggressive mode, and see some sparks fly! (See my other >thread which I will post in a few minutes :) ) Aggressive mode and suicidal mode were weaker in my testing than normal. However, thanks to a suggestion in a John Birch Society forum, I am using tweaks which have markedly strengthen ct15.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.