Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:20:55 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 11:00:42, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On October 20, 2002 at 03:41:56, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 19, 2002 at 21:44:49, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>I have just finished the book by Feng-Hsiung Hsu. In just a shot, from after >>>lunch to this time, meal time. Very interesting. You cannot stop he reading. >>>First big impression: if this guy and his team had worked just one year more on >>>Deep Blue, Garry has been crushed to ashes, to atoms. Yes, because once and >>>again Deep Blue appears as an uncomplete device full of bugs and problems, >> >> >>I am surprised that after this people still believe that it's evaluation was >>better than the evaluation of Deep Fritz of today. > >I'm surprised people still think it's evaluation was worse than Fritz of today. >But it doesn't matter - I think DB will never play again (stupid IBM), so >neither side can EVER win the argument. The main point is the following: "Deep Blue appears as an uncomplete device full of bugs and problems" I do not believe that something that is full of bugs and problems can have better evaluation than Deep Fritz that was tested more seriously. I do not say that they could not do something better than Fritz in case that they continued the work but it did not happen. Uri
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.