Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:22:41 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 14:48:53, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >Taken from www.computerschaak.nl (see laatste nieuws for more details): > >Ranking after round 6 of Open Dutch Computer Chess Championship 2002 >No. PNo. Name Score WP SB PS rat. TPR W-We >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1. 1 Chess Tiger 5.5 22.5 20.75 18.5 0000 - 0 > 2. 5 The King 4.5 22.0 14.50 17.5 0000 - 0 > 3. 7 Insomniac 4.0 23.0 13.50 16.0 0000 - 0 > 2 Diep 4.0 18.5 10.50 15.0 0000 - 0 > 9 Tao 4.0 18.5 9.00 13.0 0000 - 0 > 6. 11 Deep Sjeng 3.5 23.0 11.75 13.5 0000 - 0 > 4 IsiChess 3.5 20.0 8.50 11.5 0000 - 0 > 8. 3 Warp 3.0 19.0 6.00 11.0 0000 - 0 > 6 XiniX 3.0 16.5 5.00 11.0 0000 - 0 > 10. 12 The Baron 2.5 16.5 4.75 8.5 0000 - 0 > 10 Goldbar-C 2.5 15.5 5.25 8.0 0000 - 0 > 12. 14 Shark 2.0 15.5 3.50 5.5 0000 - 0 > 13 ZZZZZZ 2.0 15.0 2.50 6.5 0000 - 0 > 15 31337 / Celes 2.0 14.0 2.00 4.0 0000 - 0 > 15. 8 Ant 1.5 15.0 1.50 7.5 0000 - 0 > 16. 16 Djenghis 0.5 13.5 1.00 1.0 0000 - 0 I wonder what happened to Ant in that tournament. The winboard version of Ant is clearly better than the winboard version of Celes. It lost against the baron and celes with 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 and in both games the queen came later to d8. I do not understand this opening choice. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.