Author: Alessandro Damiani
Date: 12:48:43 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 14:51:21, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>I changed my mind, the method is very ok.
>
>I was just confused by how you wrote "tactical moves" and the description for
>them. But is all ok.
>
>Thanks.
I used the definition of a "tactical move" as it is used in chess. Nothing else.
I made examples of threats to pieces (meat on the bones). Nothing more or less.
You know, the code I cited was not intended to be a summary of Don Beal's paper.
It was just an explanation of pessimistic view in qsearch to Tomar. I realized
that he didn't understand my words about that (null-move). Therefore I explained
by using code.
You can find Don Beal's paper in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 43, Number 1:
Donald F. Beal: A Generalised Quiescence Search Algorithm.
I don't know if there is a digital version online.
Alessandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.