Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Great Result for Fritz and puts to rest some questions.

Author: martin fierz

Date: 13:11:32 10/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 20, 2002 at 04:17:08, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On October 19, 2002 at 20:07:17, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On October 19, 2002 at 17:43:07, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>
>>>On October 19, 2002 at 12:44:23, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>Resigning in a drawn position is something that I do not expect myself to do and
>>>>the same for losing a piece by simple tactic in the previous game.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>I think Kramnik was going to go under the wheels even if he didn't blunder his
>>>knight.  Maybe the position was theoretically drawn, but it's hard for me to
>>>imagine how a (mere :-) human could prevent Fritz from steadily advancing its
>>>passed pawn.
>>
>>in the game kramnik blundered a knight fritz had no passed pawn.
>>
>>> I think that ending would be about as tough for a human as one can
>>>find.
>>no way. i played it as black against fritz 7 on my admittedly slow laptop and
>>drew easily at 2/40. fritz has no idea what to play there...
>>
>>aloha
>>  martin
>>>Dave
>
>Am I thinking of the wrong game?  There was a game where one side had an extra
>b-pawn, the other side has an extra pawn on the kingside that didn't look very
>useful.  My impression was that the passed pawn would be very hard to stop in a
>Q+N ending, particularly since computers are better with Qs and with Ns that
>people. :-)
>
>Dave

then you should look at the games again :-)

in game 5 kramnik blundered a knight with what must be his biggest mistake in
years in a position where he could have played a 4-3 queen endgame. no passed
pawns there.

in game 6 he resigned a position where there was a relatively clear drawing
path, which, if you saw it, would actually be easy against the computer. but
it's very hard to see the idea in the first place, so i don't think you can
really blame him for that. BTW, the idea is that you sac one of your rooks
against N+b-pawn, and reach a dead drawn KRPP-KQP endgame where there is no
chance at all to go wrong. since fritz IS dumb, it has no idea that this is a
draw and will make no attempt to avoid it. that's why it would have been easy
for kramnik.

aloha
  martin



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.