Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:29:40 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 19:09:08, Mark Young wrote: >On October 20, 2002 at 15:58:41, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On October 20, 2002 at 13:56:49, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On October 20, 2002 at 12:50:44, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 20, 2002 at 12:47:39, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It seems that Kramnik was handicapped in numerous ways, all deriving from the >>>>>fact that he is human. >>>>> >>>>>But his few days with the computer prior to the match didn't seem to have any >>>>>bearing on the result at all. Other factors seemed to dominate. >>>>> >>>>>My perception. >>>>> >>>>>Bob D. >>>> >>>>I still think that kramnik has an unfair advantage. >>>> >>>>I think that kramnik could win the match in case that he wanted to do it. >>>>I believe that smirin could beat Fritz in the same conditions. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>You keep questioning GM Kramnik's ethics, if you said that to his face I bet he >>>would punch you in the mouth. >> >> >>I'm sure he would not, he is a very friendly and peaceful man. > > OH!! He just a liar and a cheater who fixes matches, that What I have been >reading on here!!! 1)There is no contradiction between being a lier and being a friendly and peaceful man. 2)Kramnik also admitted that in the second game that he lost he went for the sacrifice because he looked for the beauty. I thought also about that point when I posted: "I think that kramnik could win the match in case that he wanted to do it." It seems that even if we assume that Kramnik did not lose on purpose there was a more important target for him than winning the match. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.