Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 05:36:47 10/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2002 at 07:14:51, Brian Katz wrote: >On October 21, 2002 at 06:22:59, Daniel Clausen wrote: [snip] >>>As an experiment, since I believe Fritz 7 performs better than Deep-Fritz 7 >>>when using a single processor (even though Chessbase boasts otherwise, >>>stating that DF7 is stronger even when usning a single processor). >>>I raised the Hash Table settings for Fritz 7 to 192 MB as opposed to >>>Deep-Fritz 7 set at 32 MB Hash. >>>Surely, 192 should be much too high for such a time control with my processor >>>speed. Well, Fritz 7 still beat out Deep-Fritz 7 by 5.0-3.0 >I don't think one needs a degree to notice that if 10 8 round tournaments are >run, and one engine comes out ahead in almost all of them, that there might >something to it. I have also had many 20 round tournaments with Fritz 7 coming >out ahead. You wrote in your first post, that you played 8 games with the new HT-setting for DF. I replied to exactly that, nothing more nothing less. I'm not sure under what circumstances you played all the other 8-round tournaments where F7 won, but: 1. You didn't mention them in the first post 2. It sounds to me that the setting "192MB for DF" was not active then and therefore is a completely different test Anyway, I apologize, if I sounded a bit too rude. I usually shut up when I read about these oh-so-scientific test tournamnents, but once in a while I say something. ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.