Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 13:19:57 10/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
>'clearly better' is a bit harsch I suppose. I valued (a stable) ant at ~2300, >while baron is ~2200. It's been a while since I tested with Baron though. Which rating list have you been using? The ratings are rather the other way around. While Ant's rating should be quite stable (as the latest version is around for at least more than a year) Baron has improved a lot (so rating lists show a little too low rating). And the current version that is playing in Leiden is way stronger than the latest released version. Just look at what it is doing in WBEC division 2 at the moment... See you next saturday. Richard.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.