Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 14:34:38 10/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2002 at 16:49:05, Johan Hutting wrote: >On October 21, 2002 at 16:19:57, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>>'clearly better' is a bit harsch I suppose. I valued (a stable) ant at ~2300, >>>while baron is ~2200. It's been a while since I tested with Baron though. >> >>Which rating list have you been using? > >I only consider Andreas Hermann's list usually, but unfortunately he stopped. >However, I was referring to the games baron played on my comp vs celes. I >downloaded it a couple of months ago, so it's possible that the version is >rather weak. I guess the use of 'is' is a bit confusing :) I meant I valued the >build I had at around 2200 That would probably be either 0.33 or 0.35. You'll have to add at least a 100 points for the version playing at Leiden ... Richard.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.