Author: Dana Turnmire
Date: 08:15:29 10/22/02
I am constantly hearing about how HIARCS is the most positional program as opposed to Fritz which is supposed to be one of the fastest and less intelligent as far as chess knowledge. I know there are many here that aren't in the master class and wouldn't be able to tell by just looking at a score why one program is so much more intelligent when it comes to chess knowledge. Could someone present several positions which show the supposedly stark contrast in the two programs? Maybe there is a positional test suite that may show the supposedly positional superiority of HIARCS over Fritz?
This page took 2.32 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.