Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 09:48:23 10/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
Dana, Both programs lack long term planning. Both programs will get better as our computers get better and faster. Good things come to those who wait. I prefer the newest computer program that I have. Right now that is Genius 7.0. Tomorrow it may be Fritz 8.x Out of the 10,000+ members at this site I doubt that we have more than 25 who are over 2200 ELO. Vincent Diepeeven and Stephen Ham are way above this level. Most chess programmers with the exception of Vincent and Marty Hirsch are not strong masters. TJF On October 22, 2002 at 11:15:29, Dana Turnmire wrote: >I am constantly hearing about how HIARCS is the most positional program as >opposed to Fritz which is supposed to be one of the fastest and less intelligent >as far as chess knowledge. I know there are many here that aren't in the master >class and wouldn't be able to tell by just looking at a score why one program is >so much more intelligent when it comes to chess knowledge. Could someone >present several positions which show the supposedly stark contrast in the two >programs? > >Maybe there is a positional test suite that may show the supposedly positional >superiority of HIARCS over Fritz?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.