Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Differences in HIARCS and Fritz

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:15:47 10/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 22, 2002 at 12:48:23, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:

>Dana,
>
>Both programs lack long term planning.  Both programs will get better as our
>computers get better and faster. Good things come to those who wait. I prefer
>the newest computer program that I have. Right now that is Genius 7.0. Tomorrow
>it may be Fritz 8.x
>
>Out of the 10,000+ members at this site I doubt that we have more than 25 who
>are over 2200 ELO. Vincent Diepeeven and Stephen Ham are way above this level.


Which elo?
I think that getting 2200 elo in correspondence games is not an hard task when
people can use programs to help them.

It is not personal against stephan and I believe that he is a good player and
got his elo not by using computers to help him.

I also believe that losing 2.5-1.5 against computers in correspondence match
without help of computer is not something that most 2000 players can do but I do
not know if he has more than 2200 in normal chess.

Do you know about more than 220 for Stephen Ham not in correspondence chess?

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.