Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Differences in HIARCS and Fritz

Author: George Sobala

Date: 10:29:45 10/22/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 22, 2002 at 11:25:02, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 22, 2002 at 11:15:29, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>
>>I am constantly hearing about how HIARCS is the most positional program as
>>opposed to Fritz which is supposed to be one of the fastest and less intelligent
>>as far as chess knowledge.
>
>I am constantly hear it and constantly do not believe it.
>I believe that people say that hiarcs is more intelligent only because of the
>fact that hiarcs prints less nodes per seconds.
>
>Uri

It is purely subjective I know, but when following live games between GMs at
classical time-levels, Hiarc8 appears to more often predict (in its "top three")
the move actually played.

• A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Bob Durrett 11:57:23 10/22/02
  • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Ed Panek 11:00:48 10/23/02
  • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Murray 02:32:41 10/23/02
    • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Bob Durrett 18:08:59 10/23/02
  • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Uri Blass 12:08:24 10/22/02
    • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Aaron Tay 02:43:01 10/23/02
    • Re: A Great New [?] Idea for Testing Chess Computers Bob Durrett 12:12:21 10/22/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.