Author: Johan Hutting
Date: 11:21:06 10/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2002 at 10:25:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 22, 2002 at 10:20:30, Johan Hutting wrote: > >>Tony's explanation is what happened, I was standing next to the author of Shark >>when he offered it (twice!). This may have to do with Shark winning on time >>saturday while Celes had a mate in 5 in the final position. I wouldn't be happy >>with 2 wins on time in lost positions. Perhaps if I was commercial and going for >>the top spots, but still... >>> >>>It seems that Djenghis has no repetition detection(otherwise I cannot understand >>>the move Ke4) > >The final position in the pgn that I downloaded was a draw position. Maybe it 'was', but it _is_ not. I don't see a threefold repetition after 34.g5, I only see a _possible_ repetition after those moves. Read the part that you conveniently snipped out: "AFAIK, Djenghis doesn't have the repcheck, however Shark does, but it attempts to _avoid_ it. The author had already mentioned this during the game." Note the part that says _avoid_. >If what you say is correct then it means that the pgn is wrong. No, it just means you are. It is irrelevant anyway, the score is final by decision of both operators.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.