Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 11:57:23 10/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2002 at 13:29:45, George Sobala wrote: >On October 22, 2002 at 11:25:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 22, 2002 at 11:15:29, Dana Turnmire wrote: >> >>>I am constantly hearing about how HIARCS is the most positional program as >>>opposed to Fritz which is supposed to be one of the fastest and less intelligent >>>as far as chess knowledge. >> >>I am constantly hear it and constantly do not believe it. >>I believe that people say that hiarcs is more intelligent only because of the >>fact that hiarcs prints less nodes per seconds. >> >>Uri > >It is purely subjective I know, but when following live games between GMs at >classical time-levels, Hiarc8 appears to more often predict (in its "top three") >the move actually played. You have a really neat idea there! [A way to identify the most "human-like" chess computer] Select fify or 100 excellent games played between the top GMs in the last year or two. Then let each chess computer have plenty of time [at least 5 minutes per move] to deliberate over each of the positions in those games. After all is said and done, then the Chess Computer which predicted the largest number of GM moves "wins" and is declared some sort of "champ." Ideally, find a sponsor with lots of money! [Preferably several million dollars.] Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.