Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:45:44 10/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2002 at 16:21:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 22, 2002 at 14:53:21, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On October 22, 2002 at 11:40:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2002 at 01:13:43, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>> >>>>Sandia Labs is just down the street from me on Kirtland Air Force Base. >>>>I lived about 1 kilometer from the labs when I lived on base. This "Red >>>>Storm" machine will do 40,000,000,000,000 operations per second. Put Fritz X >>>>on that and smoke it. >>>> >>> >>>Put fritz on that and it will use exactly one cpu. That machine is pure >>>message-passing. >> >>If it would use all, I think it should solve chess. > >Chess is exponential. Even if it had 16,000 X 16,000 processors, it would not >be anywhere near enough. I know that required speed would be extremely great. But there must be a limit at which chess would actually be solved, even if impossible to arrange. And with the application of enough intelligence, that amount of speed could be reduced significantly to still get the playing strength to a level that will never lose any game to any machine or man. I'm not speaking about if it is possible to arrange that in existing levels of hardware in a PC of today. S.Taylor > > >> >>S.Taylor >>> >>> >>>> >>>>TJF >>>> >>>>On October 22, 2002 at 00:06:51, Sally Weltrop wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/27718.html
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.