Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Fairy Tales of alleged cheating in the Kramnik exhibition

Author: Mark Young

Date: 19:56:03 10/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 22, 2002 at 18:19:13, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 21, 2002 at 22:34:22, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On October 21, 2002 at 00:03:30, Brian Katz wrote:
>>
>>>  What I do not understand is   How on Earth would Deep-Fritz 7 accept an
>>>unforced draw in 21 moves. Even if the Drawing parameters are set lower.
>>>  On ICC games my Fritz 7 programs plays on for quite a long time in drawn
>>>positions.
>>>   Something like this makes me wonder if the match was fixed.
>>>Any opinions??
>>>Brian Katz
>>
>>Deep Fritz did not accept the draw. The operators of Fritz accept or decline
>>draw offers. The program had no say what so ever.
>>
>>Being down 2 game and having the world champion offer the program a draw in the
>>last game for a sure tie match was just too much for the fritz team to pass up.
>
>
>I am still amazed that the rules allow this.  The program is supposedly playing
>the game.
>The program should be able to offer draws, and accept draw offers, by itself.
>The human
>operator should be unable to play _any_ role in the proceedings whatsoever
>except to enter
>moves and make moves on the board (blind chess rules)...
>
>If a program is unable to accept/decline draw offers, it can not play legal
>chess.  If it is
>unable to offer draw offers, it could be considered a "rude" box.  :)

I agree...I don't think it would be hard to program the computer understand
match tactics and this being part of the programs strength or weakness.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.