Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RE-INSTATE SEAN evans

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 03:52:52 09/07/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 07, 1998 at 03:07:57, Ed Schröder wrote:

>My 2 cents. When somebody robs a bank he is put in jail. When he after
>some years is released there is no obligation for him to apology for the
>damage he has done to enter society again. For that he was put in jail.
>
>When out of jail the person gets a new chance and it's up to him to do
>better or to spoil it again.
>
>Why not copy this rule for CCC too? I mean it is a standard rule in every
>civilized country and the whole world since its existence (till now) wasn't
>able to come up with something better :)
>
>Measures could be:
>- Warning (email only)
>- Yellow card (email only), 2 yellow cards = Red card (1)
>- Red card (1), banned from CCC for (?) months.
>- Red card (2), banned from CCC for life.
>
>I have no idea if it is wise to make "red cards" public. It maybe depends on the
>case and what has happened. All I want to say on this is that when people get
>a warning or a yellow card they (right or wrong) feel humiliated and putting it
>into public will make that 10 times worse. So I think email is the best way.
>
>If you have such a set of rules (not necessarily the above ones of course) then
>we can stop having this kind of discussions.
>
>In this respect there is almost no risk to invite banned people back in CCC. I
>mean they already have red card (1). As in real life everybody deserves a
>second chance. It's then up to them to spoil it again or not.
>
>For what it is worth.

A lot, I think. At least, I totally agree with you. This asking for an apology I
find humiliating and unnecessary. If someone gets a red card, applying for
membership again after X months is already an implicit declaration of good will.
This should be enough.

I believe too that a first red card should mean exclusion from CCC for a given
period of time, say 3 months. After this, it should be up to the excluded person
to apply again, with no further steps involved. This was also the original idea
accepted in the founders group.

I am talking in general, not specifically about this Sean Evans.

Enrique

>- Ed -



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.