Author: Ed Panek
Date: 11:00:48 10/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2002 at 14:57:23, Bob Durrett wrote: >On October 22, 2002 at 13:29:45, George Sobala wrote: > >>On October 22, 2002 at 11:25:02, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2002 at 11:15:29, Dana Turnmire wrote: >>> >>>>I am constantly hearing about how HIARCS is the most positional program as >>>>opposed to Fritz which is supposed to be one of the fastest and less intelligent >>>>as far as chess knowledge. >>> >>>I am constantly hear it and constantly do not believe it. >>>I believe that people say that hiarcs is more intelligent only because of the >>>fact that hiarcs prints less nodes per seconds. >>> >>>Uri >> >>It is purely subjective I know, but when following live games between GMs at >>classical time-levels, Hiarc8 appears to more often predict (in its "top three") >>the move actually played. > >You have a really neat idea there! [A way to identify the most "human-like" >chess computer] Select fify or 100 excellent games played between the top GMs in >the last year or two. Then let each chess computer have plenty of time [at >least 5 minutes per move] to deliberate over each of the positions in those >games. After all is said and done, then the Chess Computer which predicted the >largest number of GM moves "wins" and is declared some sort of "champ." >Ideally, find a sponsor with lots of money! [Preferably several million >dollars.] > >Bob D. I would modify this to be " predicting the winners moves closest" Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.