Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Behind deep Blue: kramnik's biggest blunders?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 14:02:51 10/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 23, 2002 at 14:54:09, martin fierz wrote:

>On October 23, 2002 at 11:26:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On October 23, 2002 at 05:08:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 22, 2002 at 17:29:53, martin fierz wrote:
>>>
>>>let's be clear. the kramnik guy was happy to receive
>>>a million dollar in advance. Without much effort he played
>>>a few moves and it was 3-1. Then everyone started complaining
>>>that the match got no publicity and got no excitement.
>>>
>>>He then gives away a piece in a clear drawn position with
>>>a 1b trick (1 check in between). That's bullet blunder level.
>>>
>>>In fact i don't make such mistakes that much at bullet and
>>>last time i made such a mistake at slow level was a year or
>>>10 ago. Kramnik had plenty of time.
>>>
>>>0% chance he didn't deliberately blunder there.
>>
>>I think that is a totally stupid statement to make.  I can point out GM blunders
>>in _every_ tournament I have watched online.  I have seen them overlook a mate
>>in 2.  A hanging queen.  You-name-it.  Human GMs _do_ make mistakes.  Not as
>>often as non-GM players, but also far more often than "never".
>
>bob, of course human players make mistakes. but GM != GM. kramnik is way beyond
>your average GM. i challenge you to find a tournament game ("normal" time
>control, not rapid chess) by kramnik in the last 5 years where he made such a
>blunder without time trouble. i'd be surprised if you found one :-)
>(but i'd really like to know the answer to that one!)
>
>i'm not going to say he threw the game. but i am going to say that the DF team
>was *extremely* lucky to get this kind of present by kramnik - i'd say this kind
>of mistake happens to him once in 800 games rather than once in 8 on average...
>
>aloha
>  martin

I remember seeing Anand miss a simple move that would have drawn a game
instantly instead of losing it, and I also remember a game with two top players,
IIRC one of them was Shirov, where in a KQ-KR ending the rook could have been
grapped by a simple forking check.
BTW, the game drew because the KQ-player didn't know the technique.

Maybe they didn't exactly have a lot of time left, but they weren't down to
bullet speeds AFAIR.

I am sure there are a other examples, and they probably do have nightmares about
these blunders! :)

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.