Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 18:47:56 09/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 1998 at 03:07:57, Ed Schröder wrote: <snip> >My 2 cents. When somebody robs a bank he is put in jail. When he after >some years is released there is no obligation for him to apology for the >damage he has done to enter society again. For that he was put in jail. > >When out of jail the person gets a new chance and it's up to him to do >better or to spoil it again. > >Why not copy this rule for CCC too? I mean it is a standard rule in every >civilized country and the whole world since its existence (till now) wasn't >able to come up with something better :) <snip> I neither agree nor disagree with the above. However, if we are to RELY on an anology, it is important that the anology be truly applicable. What would be the CCC anologous body to a parole board? Would the parole board hearings, rules, and procedures also have applicable CCC anologies? Maybe a better anology would be the banning of someone from a country and what that person would have to go through to get the ban lifted. How would the revies board decide on their recommendation? Incidentally, I am of the impression that the decisions of the three moderators are subject to veto by the owners of the facility CCC uses. True? Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.