Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:52:23 10/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2002 at 19:59:11, Russell Reagan wrote: >On October 23, 2002 at 15:25:04, Colin Frayn wrote: > >>Then I suddenly realised. Carlos had been sending strings to the engine of the >>form; >>3r4/5b2/1k1r1p2/Np5p/4P1p1/2R1KPP1/2P4P/R7 w >> >>(i.e. missing off the last two dashes.) The full string should be >>3r4/5b2/1k1r1p2/Np5p/4P1p1/2R1KPP1/2P4P/R7 w - - >> >>but of course the shortened version should still be valid. > >Or should it? I'm not sure if there is a FEN standard or not. Is it really a FEN >string if it's missing some fields? My program doesn't change anything if there >aren't 6 FEN fields. However, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to default the fields >that are possible to assume. The FEN standard and the EPD standard are both subsets of the PGN standard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.