Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:51:08 10/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2002 at 21:14:06, Bob Durrett wrote: >On October 22, 2002 at 16:21:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 22, 2002 at 14:53:21, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2002 at 11:40:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On October 22, 2002 at 01:13:43, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>>> >>>>>Sandia Labs is just down the street from me on Kirtland Air Force Base. >>>>>I lived about 1 kilometer from the labs when I lived on base. This "Red >>>>>Storm" machine will do 40,000,000,000,000 operations per second. Put Fritz X >>>>>on that and smoke it. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Put fritz on that and it will use exactly one cpu. That machine is pure >>>>message-passing. >>> >>>If it would use all, I think it should solve chess. >> >>Chess is exponential. Even if it had 16,000 X 16,000 processors, it would not >>be anywhere near enough. > >That may depend on how much time you give the computer to solve the problem. > >Bob D. 16000 squared processors will need thousands of years. I don't think any machine will stay up that long. :) > > >> >> >>> >>>S.Taylor >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>TJF >>>>> >>>>>On October 22, 2002 at 00:06:51, Sally Weltrop wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/27718.html
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.