Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 22:37:04 10/23/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 24, 2002 at 01:07:02, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:

>http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Track/7733/rating.txt
>
>A. Ponti

1)I do not agree that elostat is more accurate than chessbase rating.

I see that Genius is almost last place by elostat.
Genius has 0%.

My question is how can a program with 0% get a rating?

Chessbase is smarter than elostat and at least does not give rating for programs
with 0%.

2)I think that something is wrong in the list because genius is known to be
strong at fast time control and I believe that the probability for it to get 0%
in more than 10 games is very small even if it plays against the top programs.

Uri

• Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Aloisio Ponti Lopes 00:21:41 10/24/02
  • Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Tony Werten 06:04:17 10/24/02
    • Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:37:46 10/25/02
      • Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Robert Hyatt 09:34:30 10/25/02
    • Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Uri Blass 06:16:04 10/24/02
      • Re: Bullet & Blitz rating list updated! Aloisio Ponti Lopes 20:18:50 10/24/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.