Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:55:08 10/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2002 at 14:45:57, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 24, 2002 at 12:27:29, Alessandro Damiani wrote: > >>On October 24, 2002 at 07:09:17, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>How many function do you have in an incremental move generator? >>> >>>If I understood correctly programs use >>> >>>1)Generatehash(generates nothing if the hash move is illegal or null) >>>2)Generategoodcaptures >>>3)Generate killer1(generates nothing if the first killer is illegal) >>>4)Generate killer2(generates nothing if the second killer is illegal) >>>5)Generating rest >>> >>>I think that 1,3,4 may be the same function because in all of them I need to >>>check if a move is legal when I have the move(includes the from square the to >>>square and more information in case of promotion). >>> >>> >>>I first think only to have generatehash and generaterest but generaterest >>>already means that I have to change my move generator. >>> >>>I doubt if generating rest is faster than generating all because I need to check >>>for every candidate move that it is not a previous move that I already >>>generated. >>> >>>Uri >> >>What do you exactly mean by "incremental move generator"? My definition is that >>one only generates the difference in the move lists between the previous node >>and the current one. >> >>Do you really mean this approach? >> >>Alessandro > >I am not sure exactly what do you mean. >Node for me is only a position after moves that I make. >During generating moves there are not new nodes. > >I thought about generating part of the moves. > >Today movei has no function to generate part of the >moves. > >I have only generating all the moves and >even my qsearch does not have generating >only captures. > >I generate all the moves and continue to search >only captures and also checks in the first plies. > >I also use the number of legal moves for >my evaluation so I need >at least to count the number of moves in the >qsearch if I want to have the same program. > >I first want to have the same program faster and >only later to test changes in the algorithm. > >I cannot avoid counting the number of legal moves >at the last plies without changing the evaluation >because the number of legal moves is used for >evaluation not only in the leaves. > >Uri Not in the leaves the number of legal moves is used for my extension rules (today it is used for extensions almost only when the king is in check but I do not want to limit myself not to try other ideas of using this information also in more cases). It means that I do not like to use a code to count the number of moves only when the king is in check. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.