Author: martin fierz
Date: 14:33:05 10/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2002 at 09:12:50, Russell Reagan wrote: >On October 24, 2002 at 08:05:41, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>I mean which result would be DEFINITE/FINAL/LAST etc. indicator, that computer >>is better than best human in chess. >>10-0? 20-0? 40-0? And may be human mated in under 30 moves in each game? Should >>be quite clear then for most, if not for all. >> >>Jouni > >Why do you ask? No human world champion calibre player has ever lost 10-0, or >even come close to losing 10-0, much less 20-0 or 40-0, so what's the point of >even asking? umm, you are young my friend :-) too young to remember the candidate's matches which the one and only bobby played and won 6-0, against players who were also "candidates", meaning world champion calibre players. aloha martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.