Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:55:37 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 04:43:52, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >On October 25, 2002 at 00:52:08, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Try at something other than breakneck blitz speed and see what happens. >> >>I expect Genius to do much better at longer time control. > >My list is a bullet / blitz list. I'm not searching for standard time controls. >I agree with you that Genius might score better with longer time controls. The >same happens to older-than-ninety-years-old-players if you give them the hole >day to think about 1 move. > >Genius is _too_weak at bullet and blitz comparing with recent engines. Only 4 >draws out of 50 games against Ruffian! I suspect that something is wrong with the games. Genius is known to be strong at fast time control. I know that Genius3 beated kasaprov at 25 minutes per game 1.5-.5 only 4 draws against ruffian out of 50 games is results of engines that are 200-300 elo weaker than Genius. It cannot be the result of genius in fair conditions. I suspect that the interface of Genoius6.5 is buggy and does not give genius fair conditions(I do not have this interface) Maybe something else in your setting is wrong. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.