Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 04:53:23 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 04:55:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 25, 2002 at 04:43:52, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: > >>On October 25, 2002 at 00:52:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Try at something other than breakneck blitz speed and see what happens. >>> >>>I expect Genius to do much better at longer time control. >> >>My list is a bullet / blitz list. I'm not searching for standard time controls. >>I agree with you that Genius might score better with longer time controls. The >>same happens to older-than-ninety-years-old-players if you give them the hole >>day to think about 1 move. >> >>Genius is _too_weak at bullet and blitz comparing with recent engines. Only 4 >>draws out of 50 games against Ruffian! > >I suspect that something is wrong with the games. >Genius is known to be strong at fast time control. > >I know that Genius3 beated kasaprov at 25 minutes per game 1.5-.5 > >only 4 draws against ruffian out of 50 games is results of engines that are >200-300 elo weaker than Genius. >It cannot be the result of genius in fair conditions. > >I suspect that the interface of Genoius6.5 is buggy and does not give genius >fair conditions(I do not have this interface) I think it's possible that Ruffian outsearches Genius completely on modern hardware. However, in Blitz games on 80486 architecture, Genius would do much better than this. Uli > >Maybe something else in your setting is wrong. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.