Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 10:53:57 10/25/02

Go up one level in this thread

the idea of evaluation the chances to win, instead of giving an evaluation
that is MATERIAL+POSITIONAL sounds very similar to CSTal's evaluation.

CSTal has no "accurate" evaluation, instead the evaluation shows how
high the chances are to win.

this helps cstal to plan a king attack e.g.

• Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge Severi Salminen 02:24:39 10/26/02
  • Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge Thorsten Czub 04:06:09 10/26/02
    • Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge Severi Salminen 04:11:29 10/26/02
      • Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge Thorsten Czub 05:32:23 10/26/02
• Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge Vincent Diepeveen 11:35:47 10/25/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.