Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 11:02:00 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 13:11:39, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>I think the "real" SSDF list should be a one author - one entry list, the main >>reason for that is that the SSDF is considered an author ranking list (IMO >>anyway) and you shouldn't be able to push down your competeters by simply >>releasing new versions. > >In this case the list is going to be useless. > >Most users are interested in the list to find which program is the best. > >They are not interested to know what is the rating of Fritz1. >Your idea means that after Fritz1 was tested many years ago no new version of >Fritz can be tested. Hehe, nice one. Actually I was thinking of a program that was already number 1, release a new and you now hold the 1st and 2nd spot, release another and you now go home with all the medals etc.. There probably isn't much point in flooding the list if you are "way down" at 15th. -S. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.