Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 11:35:47 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 13:53:57, Thorsten Czub wrote: >the idea of evaluation the chances to win, instead of giving an evaluation >that is MATERIAL+POSITIONAL sounds very similar to CSTal's evaluation. > >CSTal has no "accurate" evaluation, instead the evaluation shows how >high the chances are to win. > >this helps cstal to plan a king attack e.g. And that story applies to *all* chess engines :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.