Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: likelihood instead of pawnunits? + chess knowledge

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 11:35:47 10/25/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 25, 2002 at 13:53:57, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>the idea of evaluation the chances to win, instead of giving an evaluation
>that is MATERIAL+POSITIONAL sounds very similar to CSTal's evaluation.
>CSTal has no "accurate" evaluation, instead the evaluation shows how
>high the chances are to win.
>this helps cstal to plan a king attack e.g.

And that story applies to *all* chess engines :)

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.