Author: Robin Smith
Date: 13:36:50 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 14:42:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 25, 2002 at 14:14:00, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On October 25, 2002 at 13:15:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>> can you show me >>>a picture of a quantum. That's the smallest detail you could show of course. >> >>Vincent you are a funny guy. This had me laughing out loud. You were joking, >>right? >> >>Robin > >No. > >Can you show me a picture of a quantum? > >I *can* show you a picture of a real processor. Plenty of them >around the net. I can't show you the picture of a quantum. > >Can you? > >The things exist for like 1/1000000000000 of a second. > >How do we create a computer from it if we can't make a clear picture of >a quantum? Sorry. I thought you were joking. You are right that you can show me a picture of a real processor. But show me a picture of a "bit", or even of an "electron". You can't. So how can we make digital computers? As for a quantum computer, I agree they don't yet exists, so I can't show you a picture, but things that exist only in theory have a nasty habit of turning into reality at some point. Don't forget that the initial theory of modern digital computers was done many years before there were actual computers you could take a picture of. And as far as "the things" existing for only 1/1000000000000 of a second (can I assume "the things" you are talking about is quantum entanglement, the theoretical basis for quantum computing? If not, what are "the things"?), this is totally untrue. Have you read anything recently about quantum entanglement or quantum computing? Theory is advancing by leaps and bounds. It remains to be seen if engineers will figure out how to do anything useful with it, but I'm guessing that eventually, yes they will. Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.