Author: Danniel Corbit
Date: 13:33:19 09/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 1998 at 06:52:52, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: [snip] >A lot, I think. At least, I totally agree with you. This asking for an apology I >find humiliating and unnecessary. If someone gets a red card, applying for >membership again after X months is already an implicit declaration of good will. >This should be enough. I totally disagree. Do you actually believe that Sean Evans [for instance] is repentant and demonstrating good will!? Go over to r.g.c.c and read 20 of his posts. And yet he applied for reinstatement. >I believe too that a first red card should mean exclusion from CCC for a given >period of time, say 3 months. After this, it should be up to the excluded person >to apply again, with no further steps involved. This was also the original idea >accepted in the founders group. I believe that if you are kicked out, then the moderators should decide when, if ever, you get back in. Remember that first you are given a warning. Then you have to unrepentently continue attacks to get the boot. Removal of larval infestations will prevent the hatchlings from eating up all the deliciously sensible posts and spawning new infestations. Again, look at r.g.c.c. and read posts by Sean and any of his cronies. The offer nothing of intellectual value and only seek to tear down. If anyone wants this crap back in here, please raise your hand. I know you are talking about general policies, and not a particular person. Do you imagine that the moderators cannot make sensible decisions in this regard? I have full confidence in any/all of them and believe that they will make decisions for the good of the group. >I am talking in general, not specifically about this Sean Evans.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.