Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 18:29:47 10/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 04:43:52, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >On October 25, 2002 at 00:52:08, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Try at something other than breakneck blitz speed and see what happens. >> >>I expect Genius to do much better at longer time control. > >My list is a bullet / blitz list. I'm not searching for standard time controls. >I agree with you that Genius might score better with longer time controls. The >same happens to older-than-ninety-years-old-players if you give them the hole >day to think about 1 move. Wazzat you say? Speak louder! I can't hear you! Bob D. > >Genius is _too_weak at bullet and blitz comparing with recent engines. Only 4 >draws out of 50 games against Ruffian! > >Genius doesn't use Nalimov tablebases. Every other engine that uses tablebases >are using Nalimov's (exception for Chessmaster). > >That's enough to say Genius needs update. Not only cosmetical update, I mean. >Not only an update for comercial purposes. Customers of the 6.5 (Millenium >package) version feel that's not the way to treat them. Look what Ed did to >Century 3 customers, Rebel XP is free for download. Look at Lokasoft's services >and you'll see what I mean. Lex Loep had updated a single file many times and >published it at his site just because I was trying to run Deep Shredder under >Chess Partner. That's what we Genius 6,5 customers want. I don't want a >cosmetical update. > >A. Ponti
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.