Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Most obscure bug *ever*

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 20:51:32 10/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 25, 2002 at 12:52:20, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On October 25, 2002 at 07:37:51, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>[snip]
>>I agree with most of your preferences, but not the last: I'd prefer stopping
>>with an error message to "ignoring and going on" every day of the week.  IMO
>>"ignoring and continuing" is the worst possible choice.
>
>Scenario:
>1.  You want to process 500 EPD rows with analysis over a weekend.
>2.  The 3rd row has a mistake in it (missing a closing quote on a comment).
>
>You want it to stop?
>
>For a tool designed for batch processing and where each individual record is a
>completely independent unit of work, stopping is asinine.
>
>IMO-YMMV.

No, I want it to emit an error for the third position and go on to process the
remaining 497 positions.  It seems that you didn't read what I wrote carefully
enough.

Dave




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.