Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12)

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 21:42:16 10/25/02

Go up one level in this thread

In reading one of those old posts, Christophe Theron was talking about how he
did his pawn evaluation in a pawn hash table. I'm curious if this is a good
idea. There are obviously far fewer pawn formations than there are chess
positions. It seems unsound, but then again so did a transposition table using a
hash table implementation at first thought.

Russell

• Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dann Corbit 23:09:55 10/25/02
  • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Russell Reagan 00:01:15 10/26/02
    • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Ricardo Gibert 04:41:41 10/26/02
      • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Russell Reagan 19:37:59 10/26/02
        • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) [corrected] Ricardo Gibert 01:38:19 10/27/02
        • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Ricardo Gibert 22:37:13 10/26/02
          • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dann Corbit 21:46:03 10/27/02
            • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Ricardo Gibert 22:54:35 10/27/02
              • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dann Corbit 11:28:41 10/28/02
    • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dan Newman 01:06:39 10/26/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.