Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: first possible example of a Blunder by Kramnik

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 00:12:45 10/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 25, 2002 at 22:36:56, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 25, 2002 at 18:22:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On October 25, 2002 at 12:18:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On October 25, 2002 at 09:55:48, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 24, 2002 at 17:17:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Here is a game where Kramnik played black, and he made the same sort of
>>>>>sacrifice he made against Deep Fritz,
>>>>
>>>>Wrong!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>but he made it against Anand, and he
>>>>>got rapped for it.  Crafty says this just drops a piece.  I ran the position
>>>>>after
>>>>>Bxf2 to a pretty deep depth and the score didn't change as I even followed the
>>>>>game for a move or two deeper.  If you let Crafty search for a black move
>>>>>there, it likes either the rook move as suggested in the annotation, or Nd8
>>>>>if you let it search longer than one second...  Score after Bxf2 is +3.5, score
>>>>>after Nd8 is +.5.
>>>>
>>>>I think we could prove very quickly why it's way too early that we could rely on
>>>>the research with our actual PC programs. Also you miss the complete problem of
>>>>that game. It's not at all the same or similar to the Nxf7 against Deep Fritz.
>>>
>>>It is similar for one main reason:  It simply drops a piece for nothing.
>>>
>>>So in that regard, it was a sacrifice that was unsound, which could be called
>>>a blunder by most any definition since it causes an equal position to turn into
>>>a dead lost position.
>>
>>What are you talking about? The position IS already lost! So it is NOT similar
>>to the Kramnik-Deep Fritz position!
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>>
>
>I'm not sure what you are talking about.  The position before the sac is not
>lost for either side.

I did not analyze the position but it is clear that one of the following is
correct:

1)The position is not lost for either side
2)The position is lost for kramnik but Crafty does not understand it.

If 2 is correct then it means that it is not similiar to the kramnik-Deep Fritz
blunder and the sacrifice may be a desperate attempt of kramnik when he found
that other lines are bad.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.