Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:20:51 10/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 14:53:39, Sune Fischer wrote: >I understanding was that the SSDF should be the computer version of the FIDE >ranking list. We don't have 5 Kasparovs on that list, so we shouldn't have 5 >Frans Morsch's on this one either :) The current purpose seems to be a buyers guide to commercial chess software, which doesn't set any limitation on the number of entries in any way as long as they're commercially separable. Nor is it prone to presenting the free alternatives. That's no problem in general, but makes for an alltogether uninteresting list IMO. >Ok, so the SSDF is _not_ an equivalent, but it should and could be! ;) >IMO they should spend their time testing more engines instead of many versions >of the same engine, but that _is_ just my opinion :) Well, it is my opinion as well ;). A computer version of the FIDE list seems more relevant. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.