Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:48:00 10/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2002 at 07:47:20, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>I did not analyze the position but it is clear that one of the following is >>correct: >> >>1)The position is not lost for either side >>2)The position is lost for kramnik but Crafty does not understand it. >> >>If 2 is correct then it means that it is not similiar to the kramnik-Deep Fritz >>blunder and the sacrifice may be a desperate attempt of kramnik when he found >>that other lines are bad. >> >>Uri <snipped> >And what do you think is the case? <g> I do not know. I am not a GM. A convincing evidence that 2 is correct can be achieved only if humans can beat chess programs with white. I do not think that the evaluation of Crafty is a convincing evidence but I also need more than a comment from GM's to be convinced that white is winning. If I can see GM's beat Crafty and other programs with white from the relevant position than the games may be a more convincing evidence. Uri
This page took 2.55 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.