Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 19:58:54 09/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 1998 at 05:49:16, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On September 06, 1998 at 13:05:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 06, 1998 at 10:57:02, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: >> >>>On September 06, 1998 at 00:18:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>(5) It would be nice if UAB would give Bob the "go-ahead" to market Crafty. >>>> >>>>There is no "go-ahead" to get. It is solely my intellectual property, and >>>>can be sold, given away, or whatever, without any control by UAB. Giving it >>>>away was *my* choice, as I've said before, *not* something dictated by my >>>>employer... they think the "freeware" approach is great due to the interest >>>>it has produced... but there would be no problems of any kind should I choose >>>>to sell it either. It just won't happen... >>>> >>>>particularly in light of the poll response.. :) >>> >>>(1) Bob, I hope you don't get thrown off by the poll. The problem is not with >>>the CCC membership itself. The poll itself was badly flawed. >>>(2) In the first place, the poll was ill-conceived and should have been "run by >>>you" before being posted. Someone apparently exercised very poor judgement and >>>owes you an apology. >> >> >>Steve sent me an idea of what was going to be asked. I responded with my normal >>"not for sale, ever"... but I see no reason why I need to approve any sort of >>poll question... After some thought, I only wish that the poll had asked the >>questions slightly differently, as it could have provided more interesting >>data... such as how many have played crafty somewhere vs how many have played >>any other specific program? How many have played it on ICC or FICS or chess.net >>or EICS of whatever, as compared to other programs running there. etc... >> >> >> >> >>>(3) You should be content with the knowledge that your intentions were >>>excellent. You only have to answer to yourself, and if religeous, to God! >> >> >>Always the case. I'm my most severe critic when it comes to computer >>chess. :) >> >>I just don't argue with myself *here* in public.. :) >> >> >>>(4) You have made a very significant contribution to the field of chess software >>>programming by creating your code and making it available to the public on the >>>internet. I do not know how to estimate the impact that has had, but am sure >>>that it is FAR from negligible. You know that, and that knowledge should make >>>you feel good. >>>(5) Polls are often very misleading, as this one was. If the questions asked >>>are not very carefully constructed, they can give very misleading results. If >>>the poll had been constructed properly, it would have shown that there is >>>widespread appreciation on CCC for the efforts you have made w.resp.to Crafty. >>>A pity that the poll did not ask the right questions. >>>(6) The work you have done with Crafty on the various chess servers has >>>undoubtedly also had a very positive impact. > >IMHO crafty is very special. It can not easyly be compared with anything else >because crafty is a reserch project and its a work in progress. >I don't want Bob Hyatt to stop his work only for producing a CD with some fancy >features. The poll was poor because the questions didn't take account to the >real benefits of crafty. > >Why I like crafty: >1. Crafty runns on several platforms. I use it on > IBM hardware AIX, SUN Solaris, Silicon Graphics IRIX, PC WinNT > >2. Crafty runs on a multiprocessor system. If Bob Hyatt succeeds in making > Crafty better it may become the strongest program available. > >3. Crafty gives anybody the possibility to make suggestions, do testing and > do some help to make crafty better. This results often in critic, however, > it may be of some help (I hope so). > >4. Crafty comes with source. You can compile crafty yourself with the proper > compiler swithes - so crafty is not crippled down on a fast processor. > >I always feel a kind of stupidity when people want to tell Bob Hyatt that he >can make some $$. Money is not everything. > Just in case, not me neither no one has asked Bob to do nothing, selling or whatever, at most we have asked him why he did not so and we have been satisfied by his answer. Nobody thinks money is everything, except sometime people that believe there is people sio stupid that thinks money is everything. Oh yes, is not, but neither is nothing. Not being everything, anyway it can be a lot of things so, in any case, to ask why is not out of the question. Fernando As someone who has critizised crafty in several ways I want to thank Bob Hyatt >for his work and encourage him to continue. There are a lot of examples for >free software that is considerably better than commercial software. > >Kind regards >Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.